Ballyclare Man Banned From Keeping Animals After Attacking 14-Week-Old Puppy

Judge Describes Attack as “Gratuitous Violence”

A defence barrister described Bradley’s actions as a “deplorable act against a defenceless animal”.

The lawyer said the footage had been difficult to watch but added that, “miraculously”, the puppy had not been physically injured.

The court was also told that Bradley has a moderate learning disability, regrets his actions and is extremely remorseful.

District Judge Nigel Broderick told Bradley that his treatment of the animal had been “quite appalling”.

He described the incident as “gratuitous violence” against a defenceless animal.

Prosecutor Requests Five-Year Animal Ban

The prosecution initially made no application for Bradley to be prohibited from keeping animals.

Judge Broderick questioned why no application had been made, noting that courts are frequently asked to impose animal ownership bans in cruelty cases.

The prosecutor subsequently applied for Bradley to be banned from keeping animals for five years.

The judge also said the case represented a “red flag”, referring to research suggesting that people who harm animals may present an increased risk of violence towards others.

Suspended Prison Sentence Imposed

Bradley was sentenced to six months in prison, suspended for three years.

He was also disqualified from owning, keeping or caring for animals for five years.

The court noted that there was no direct evidence that the puppy required veterinary treatment after the attack.